Revisiung my essay Volar with proffesor suggestions to what to fix
Adding com
Revisiung my essay Volar with proffesor suggestions to what to fix
Adding commentary to a submission that needs to entirely change isnt productive, so I think discussing the approach to the assignment would be wisest. If you refuse to meet with me, I can fall back on some commentary already included in course instructions and readings.
-This submission does not focus on the role of a single element in the work. It discusses metaphor, symbols, setting, character, and perhaps others, and thus does not satisfy requirements.
-The submission cites almost no text evidence (two?), and doesnt cite page numbers when it does. Review of reading on MLA rules is recommended.
-The submission contains subject headings; short MLA essays do not use headings, relying on unity and transition elements to create coherence.
-At one point, the submission discusses the subject matter of the film, raising serious questions
-For examination of symbols, its wise to name symbols and discuss their meaning; the words symbolize and symbolizing often reduce clarity.
-Generally, each body paragraph should cite and discuss text evidence of the element examined.
-Focus on theme is not recommended; analyzing how one element contributes to a theme is viable.
-Works Cited page and citation construction are problematic. Review of reading on MLA is recommended.
Share this:
FacebookX
